
While this may be an over-simplification of the problematic effects of HIPAA, it highlights the basic in-efficiencies. This strikes a little close to home with me, as I had to go to a doctor with an injured back 8 months ago (workers comp) and I would not sign a waiver stating "There are databases in existence that track what medications are prescribed to you, and we need your permission to access these to better serve you." or something of that nature. The idea, is to stop the over-prescription of pain meds, and that's a great goal. However, I felt it was an invasion of my privacy. I have multiple medications I take on a daily basis for a sleep disorder and ADD. I'll tell the doc what he needs to know, but this piece of paper is a slap in the face. "No, we DON'T trust you to tell us the truth" is what it's saying, and I didn't appreciate it. I also didn't recieve care beyond "Ah...you'll be fine. In a few weeks, you'll have no problems." 8 months later, I'm getting ready to contact the insurance company to see if they'll cover further doctor visits, as it's only gotten worse. If they refuse, I'll be seeking legal counsel.
Come on guys...I'd LOVE some feedback.
I have written a lot of HiPAA compliant applications. It's all common sense at a data level. HiPAA has made life easier on hospitals and tougher on insurance companies to deny claims. It's only a start, but it's better than it used to be.
Can you elaborate, maybe give me some examples of what you mean? I'm entry level on this, going on gut instinct basically, right now. I'm doing my best to learn as much as possible, but it's a lot to compute.
Doctors, clinics and hospitals cannot possibly deal with insurance companies over the telephone and expect to remain profitable, for it takes a lot of time out of their day. There must be some standardization of the process.
Before HIPAA, every insurance company could and routinely did annoy doctors etc. by making them fill in forms. HIPAA made that a standard electronic form, remember it stands for Insurance Portability.
Things aren't perfect now, but your complaint is simply answered. Remember Rush Limbaugh getting into a painkiller addiction? Thousands of people get into trouble this way, it's not a moral failing, just an addiction. But these addicts exploit a data weakness: Doctor A doesn't know if Dr. B has prescribed you Oxycontin. Now it can't be so easily hidden.
This database of which you're so afraid could save your life. If Dr. A prescribes an MAOI inhibitor, and Dr. B doesn't know about it, Dr. B's prescription could kill you.
Exactly what are you afraid of here? Think this through, because there is something to fear. You are afraid your data will be disclosed to third parties without your knowledge or consent, a very real concern. That's why they put the disclaimer on the form, so you'd know the data was being gathered on you, so it would be with your knowledge and consent.
Your thing about Dr. A and Dr. B is flawed. Every time I go to a doctor, they always ask what prescriptions I'm currently taking. I then tell them. There you go.
Yeah, pain pill addiction is a problem. I'm not even asking for pain meds. I want actual treatment, and can't get this doctor (one of only three I can see, per the worker's comp policy at the place of employment) to take me seriously. I had this same problem occur in 2004, and the worker's comp at my job then allowed me to go to my family doctor, who gave me a set of exercises to do.
I wound up getting pissed this time, and going to my family doctor on my own dime, to get the exercises. They're not helping this time, and I'm thinking it's time for a little chiropractic. Problem is, I couldn't even get the doctor to really listen to my problem when it occurred.
Yes, I'm not interested in having my privacy violated, either. Regardless of any disclaimer they may put on, if I have to sign a waiver giving them permission, it means this data is protected, and it's protected for a reason, right? Seems a lot like the credit card contracts terms when you make a payment late on a completely different account, and it affects your credit, and this is the reason given for an increase in fees, even if you've never missed a payment on this card. It's ridiculous.
Look, Tom, I do this for a living. I've done four Blue Cross / Blue Shield franchises and the BCBS Association itself. I've been writing HIPAA-compliant applications for four years now, off and on. Nobody's going to farm out your data, the insurance companies jealously guard that data, they have no business interest in revealing it to anyone.
Look, I hate these insurance companies. I think there should be a simple, obvious, secure way for doctors, patients, clinics and hospitals to deal with claims, exactly like we clear checks through the Fed. You should be able to go to any doctor you want and he should be able to get a claim processed for treating you. Many doctors are getting out of general medicine, it's too much trouble dealing with the insurance companies and the paperwork. We've now got a huge shortage of GPs.
Of course your doctor ought to ask you what prescriptions you're taking. What if you forgot to name your MAOI inhibitor? Do you want to die or something? Do you have any idea how many medications are contraindicated for MAOI inhibitors? Your little anecdotes are true as far as they go, Tom, my software processes millions of claims a day for the largest health insurer in the world. And if it weren't for HIPAA, the system would be far worse than you can possibly imagine.
Look, Tom, I do this for a living.
Obviously, you know what you're talking about. I'm not trying to dispute you, as much as I'm trying to work it all out for myself. Healthcare is a HUGE beef with me, in case you haven't noticed, and maybe you can get an idea of where I'm coming from by checking out a few other articles I've written. I also have a distrust of the corporation, for various reasons.
First, a refutation of right wing talking points:, next, some proposals on how to bring down costs. My Human Events essay will also attempt to provide some background on he and the corporation, also.
Respectfully,
Joseph L. Rogers
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |